Nepal: Heavy monsoon rains this fiscal year brought with them death and destruction in Nepal. But they also resulted in some good news.
The agriculture ministry
announced on Friday that Nepali farmers anticipate a record-breaking paddy
harvest this fiscal year. Nepal recorded one of the fastest paddy
transplantation rates in many decades, courtesy of “above-normal rainfall,”
supporting higher paddy output.
A double-digit harvest in
Madhesh province, where insufficient rainfall had long been a problem, boosted
the national paddy production.
The year-on-year paddy
production could grow by about 4.04 percent this fiscal year, reaching a new record
of 5.95 million tonnes, according to a preliminary estimate by the Ministry of
Agriculture and Livestock Development.
“This is the highest volume
of paddy production on record,” said Matina Joshi Vaidya, the ministry
spokesperson.
The growth in paddy output
could offer some respite to the KP Sharma Oli-led administration. The country’s
economy is otherwise grappling with low output, which results in higher
imports.
Based on the government’s
minimum support price, the total value of paddy, excluding byproducts like
straw and husk, is Rs213.20 billion. Paddy is transplanted across most of Nepal
in June and harvested in October-November.
The ministry attributed this
optimism to favourable weather conditions in the transplantation season, which
runs from June to July, and improved access to quality seeds and fertilisers.
Officials noted that while
some regions faced significant crop losses, other areas experienced
higher-than-expected yields, offsetting the overall impact of the floods.
The heavy rainfall in late
September triggered floods and landslides in most parts of the country, causing
a loss of Rs46.68 billion to the Nepali economy.
According to the preliminary
loss and damage assessment report released by the National Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Authority under the home ministry in November, the
floods and landslides from September 26 to 28 caused significant damage to the
physical infrastructure sector, followed by the social and productive sectors.
The assessment showed that
65,380 hectares of agricultural land and 26,698 livestock were affected,
resulting in an estimated economic loss of Rs5.88 billion. Seven irrigation
projects were hit, leading to a loss of Rs1.35 billion.
“Yes, floods and landslides
did affect a few areas in Bagmati province. But the country’s food baskets,
mainly the southern Tarai belt, remained unaffected, which resulted in higher
paddy output,” said Vaidya.
Paddy output boomed in
Madhesh province, which occupies 26 percent of the country’s total paddy
fields.
Five of the eight districts
of Madhesh province are drought-prone, which affects the national output
annually. A massive outflow of youths to foreign lands, creating a shortage of
labourers for agricultural activities, has added to the difficulties of local
farmers in the province.
This fiscal year, the regular
and heavy downpours proved to be a boon for farmers in the province.
Agro experts say that due to
regular and abundant monsoon rains, Madhesh province surpassed its neighbour,
Koshi, in terms of paddy transplantation rate in June-July for the first time.
Experts say transplanting
dates differ from region to region.
Early transplantation has
some advantages.
Early transplanted paddy
mostly escapes pest attack, and this reduces the additional cost of inputs such
as pesticide application.
It also ensures timely next
cycle of crops on the same field.
The ministry estimated that
paddy output in Madhesh province would jump 10.70 percent to 1.48 million
tonnes this fiscal year, with the highest productivity of 3.96 tonnes per
hectare.
After Madhesh, Koshi province
saw a slight growth in output, increasing by 2.16 percent, to 1.46 million
tonnes.
Lumbini province was the
third-highest paddy producer, with a harvest of 1.36 million tonnes, up 4.06
percent from the previous year.
The Sudurpaschim province
also saw production growth. The ministry said that year-on-year output there
might jump to 636,212 tonnes, a 6.19 percent rise.
However, the other three
provinces—Bagmati, Gandaki and Lumbini—saw a negative output growth.
Paddy is a staple crop in
Nepal, and a strong harvest could bolster food security and provide much-needed
economic relief to rural communities struggling with low incomes.
This fiscal year, paddy was
transplanted in 1.42 million hectares, including spring paddy transplanted or
sown in 104,712 hectares in March-April. According to the ministry, the spring
paddy output has been estimated at 520,808 tonnes.
According to Vaidya, the
ministry’s spokesperson, average productivity was also at a record high of 5.38
tonnes per hectare.
Paddy is Nepal’s
highest-earning farm commodity and tens of thousands of farmers rely on its
income. Economists reckon high output may cool down inflation and boost the
economy.
This fiscal year, the monsoon
entered eastern Nepal three days earlier than the normal onset date of June 10.
According to the Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, it withdrew from
eastern Nepal on October 12, delayed by ten days.
The 112-day-long monsoon
brought 1,691.3 millimetres of rainfall, according to rainfall data from the
past 30 years. This was 16 percent more than the department had anticipated.
Nepal recorded a record high
paddy harvest of 5.62 million tonnes in 2020-21, thanks to a surplus of farm
hands with migrant workers returning home amid Covid lockdowns.
Adequate fertiliser supplies
and a good monsoon helped them produce a bumper harvest.
However, paddy output shrank
the following year.
In 2021-22, the harvest
dropped by 8.74 percent year-on-year to 5.13 million tonnes due to unseasonal
October rainfall. As per the ministry’s report, the downpours damaged paddy
crops worth Rs8.26 billion, the highest losses on record.
In 2022-23, paddy output rose
7 percent to 5.48 million tonnes.
About 90 percent of the
world’s rice is grown and consumed in Asia. As a staple food for more than half
of the world’s population, it is one of the most important crops to ensure
global food security.
0 Comments